| | FEAR's Brief Bank II: indexed by issue |
| | ***************************************************************************************** |
| | Administrative forfeiture | [ | 2 | ] |
| | Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion for Return of Seized Property |
| | Once The Government Realized That Notice Was Not Properly Given and That the Statute of Limitations Had |
| | Been Exhausted, Defense of This Motion Was Not Substantially Justified |
| | by | Perez, Shawn |
| | U.S. | v. | John Doe | C.D.Cal | SA - CR-91-66 | ( | 1997 | ) |
| | browser view: | available | BrowserView | filed: |
| | Word Perfect version: | available | WordPerfect |
| | MS_Word version: | MSWord |
| | RTF version: | RichTextFormat | [ | 41e007 | ] |
| | PDF version: | [ | 237 | ] |
| | . |
| | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS MORRIS |
| | WINTON AND LENNOX LAYNE AND PROSPECTIVE INTERVENORS CANDY |
| | CHANDLER AND SHIRLEY LYONS |
| | Plaintiffs and prospective intervenors move for summary judgment on grounds that they were deprived of |
| | property without due process when their property was seized and forfeited (or in the case of one plaintiff, |
| | proceeded against in a judicial action for a constitutionally unreasonable amount of time) without notice to them |
| | or an opportunity to be heard. |
| | by | Grantland, Brenda |
| | Terri Patterson | v. | District of Columbia | D.C. Cir. | 5726-87 | ( | 1988 | ) |
| | browser view: | BrowserView | filed: |
| | Word Perfect version: | WordPerfect |
| | MS_Word version: | MSWord |
| | RTF version: | RichTextFormat | [ | PatterMOSJ1 | ] |
| | PDF version: | available | [ | 239 | ] |
| | . |
| | Thursday, January 29, 2009 | Page 3 of 3 |