| FEAR's Brief Bank II Motions, pleadings and briefs |
| | Brief Bank II: indexed by issue |
| | *************************************************************************************************** |
| | Change of Venue | [ | 629 | ] |
| | Order |
| | Rule 21(b) provides, "[u]pon the defendant's motion, the court may transfer the proceeding, or one or more |
| | counts, against that defendant to another district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the |
| | interest of justice." The motion "may be made at of before arraignment or at any other time the court or |
| | these rules prescribe." Fed.R.Crim.P.21(d). While one factor used to evaluate a Rule 21(b) motion is the |
| | location where the criminal conduct occurred, Rule 21(b) allows a venue to be in a district where no part of |
| | the offense occurred. According the the Seventh Circuit, nothing in this Rule "or in cases interpreting it place |
| | on the defendant seeking change the burden of establishing 'truly compelling circumstances' for such a |
| | change. It is enough if, all relevant things considered, the case would be better off transferred to another |
| | district." In considering inconvenience to the defendants, the court may apply a ten-factor test, quoted with |
| | apparent approval by the Supreme Court in Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.,376 U.S. 240 |
| | (1964) |
| | by |
| | U.S. | v. | $19,985.90 | E.D.N.C | 5:05-CV- | ( | 2007 | ) |
| | browser view: | BrowserView | filed: | 4/9/2007 |
| | Word Perfect | WordPerfect |
| | MS_Word version: | MSWord |
| | RTF version: | RichTextFormat | [ | OrderTransferV | ] |
| | PDF version: | available | [ | 553 | ] |
| | . |
| | ORDER |
| | On April 9 the court ordered transfer of venue in related criminal case. April 10 Claimants' moved for |
| | transfer of venue, and same day Government moved for stay of criminal transfer until after it has a chance |
| | to move for reconsideration of the venue change. Government motion to stay granted. Where Claimants' |
| | motion for transfer of venue in civil forfeture case relies heavily on transfer of the criminal case, and such |
| | transfer will be the subject of the government's motion to reconsider, it is appropriate for the court to |
| | consider and address the issues raised by these motions simultaneously, after full briefing by parties. |
| | by |
| | U.S. | v. | $19,985.90 | E.D.N.C | 5:05-CV- | ( | 2007 | ) |
| | browser view: | BrowserView | filed: | 4/13/2007 |
| | Word Perfect | WordPerfect |
| | MS_Word version: | MSWord |
| | RTF version: | RichTextFormat | [ | Order070413 | ] |
| | PDF version: | available | [ | 549 | ] |
| | . |
| | Sunday, May 20, 2007 | Page 2 of 4 |
Page 2. (c) 2006 Forfeiture Endangers American Rights Foundation