[The Tahlequah Daily Press allow readers to respond to their articles. This article has 4 responses. They are worth reading (especially response #2!!) so I have included them. Have fun. Leon] <http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1825&dept_id=129120&newsid=105 14719&PAG=461&rfi=9> Prosecutors want vehicles, cash and more from drug raid November 14, 2003 Cherokee County prosecutors want more than $4,000 in cash, vehicles and weapons seized last week when a residence east of Fort Gibson was raided. A notice of seizure and forfeiture was filed Wednesday for $4,088.10, a 1990 Chevrolet pickup, a 1997 Chevrolet Tahoe, a Honda Fourtrax four-wheeler, rifles, shotguns, binoculars, lights, black powder tools, a crossbow, bag with bow items and 42 boxes of ammunition. The property was seized when the District 27 drug task force, Muskogee drug task force, Fort Gibson police and Muskogee County sheriff's deputies searched the home of Kenneth Ray Miller. Miller was arrested Nov. 4 and formally charged Nov. 7 with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The notice of seizure and forfeiture is civil and separate from the criminal charges pending against Miller, 36. Miller can file documents to contest the property forfeiture, and if he does, a hearing will be held. If not, the district attorney's office can seek an order forfeiting the property to the state 45 days from the mailing or publication of the notice. Assistant District Attorney Donovan Dobbs is prosecuting the criminal case and filed the forfeiture notice. ©Tahlequah Daily Press 2003 Reader Opinions Post your opinion and share your thoughts with other readers! Back to Story 1 - 4 of 4 Name: VO Wright Date: Nov, 17 2003 The actual law that allows all this is a federal one, not state. It goes back years although I did not research it to the exact statute. The drug dealers/manufacturers had a choice to make when they set up business and there are ways around it, as there generally are when real money is involved. Name: Criminal Equalizer Date: Nov, 17 2003 What is the problem with Law Enforcement taking vehicles, cash, guns, ammo or anything else associated with the distribution of illegal drugs? Most departments fund their narcotics officers from the seizures made. The public will not assist in funding these type of operations. This is not illegal or unethical. If these criminals want to play the game,they must be willing to loose any item that facilitates their ability to sell drugs. All of the dopers know this before entering into their little business. Most of the dopers I know have more vehicles, guns, cash and property than I do. If John Q Citizen had to face at least one gun every time they did their job they too would understand the necessity of taking these items. Once these items are taken, they can either be sold or destroyed. It makes no sense to destroy the items when underfunded Law Enforcement can use the money to assist them in busting other dopers. According to state law, Cash, Any money raised from the sale of weapons, vehicles or other items can only be used for fighting drugs. Quit feeling sorry for these poor little dopers, they are destroying or society and some of you are aiding them in thinking they have society behind them. You people that think this way are the same people that believe we should not be in Iraq. the enemy sees that America is devided so they keep up the fight hoping America gives up. The same goes for dopers, if they think society is behind them instead of Law Enforcement they will keep pushing hoping L.E. gives up. Thank God for some department heads, and thank God for President Bush. Name: B Raab Date: Nov, 17 2003 This isn't about drugs, it's about greed-the greed of some law enforcement agencies who are expected to fund their operations through siezure of assets. When this policy first raised it's ugly head, I stated to everyone that it was setting a dangerous precedent. For my awareness, I was treated like a leper. It doesn't make me happy to say I told you so. These things must stop, as the average citizen doesn't have the resources to fight this kind of thing and even if they do, the "law?" ties up everything they own so they can't fight then offers to let them go if they don't fight the forfeiture. This is extortion, plain and simple. Name: Larry Anderson Date: Nov, 14 2003 Is this was the war on drugs is about? Charging people with Marihuana violations to take their property? I notice that there is no conviction, and they are already trying to get the property. ****************************************************** FEAR also offers an unmoderated discussion list and digests for all lists List unsubscribe: mailto:fear-list-request@mapinc.org?Body subscribe Swap to digest: mailto:owner-fear-list@mapinc.org?subject gest ******************************************************