FEAR's Brief Bank II
  Motions, pleadings and briefs


Brief Bank II: indexed by issue

*****************************************************************************************

Exclusionary rule [ 137 ]

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

AND STATEMENTS

It has long been settled that the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule applies in civil forfeiture cases to the

same extent that it applies in criminal cases.

by Grantland, Brenda

DISTRICT OF v. ONE 1980 BLUE JAGUAR: SERIES XJ53 CA-3256-87 ( 1987 )

COLUMBIA

browser view: available BrowserView filed:

Word Perfect version: available WordPerfect

MS_Word version: available MSWord

RTF version: RichTextFormat [ supp002 ]

PDF version: PDF [ 236 ]

.

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO QUASH STATE SEARCH WARRANT AND

SUPPRESS EVIDENCE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES;

DECLARATION OF GEORGE DAVID RYAN; EXHIBITS

Defendant Has Standing to Move for Suppression of All Evidence Illegally Seized During the Search of

defendant real property. The Conclusionary Allegations in the Warrant Are Not Based on Facts that Provide the

Magistrate With a Sufficient Basis to Find Probable Cause. The Allegations of the Informant and the

Conclusions of Agent that Contraband Would Be Located defendant property remain Uncorroborated. The

Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule Would Not Apply. All Statements Allegedly Made by Claimant

Were the Unattenuated Fruits of the Unlawful Search of His Home and His Unlawful Stop,Detention and Arrest.

by Perez, Shawn

U.S. v. Real Property Located in Garden Grove (Ryan) C.D.Cal CV 06-383 SGL ( 2008 )

browser view: BrowserView filed:

Word Perfect version: WordPerfect

MS_Word version: MSWord

RTF version: RichTextFormat [ Mot2Supress_R ]

PDF version: available PDF [ 618 ]

.

Thursday, October 23, 2008 Page 1 of 1



First Previous Next Last

Page 1.                    (c) 2006 Forfeiture Endangers American Rights Foundation